I
chose this one to be first, because it is so very simple. The composition is almost entirely rectilinear
(Horizontal and vertical lines). It is relieved by two diagonals and an arc (top left). The artist is
Linda Doll .
Talk about simplicity. Take a look at this simple little painting. There is very little there, but I
can hear the women chatting. Not bad if I say so myself. (the captain).
A
little less simplicity here, but certainly not very complex. The flowers are dots, and the leaves are
mostly splashes of green and yellow. Yet they are like a fountain of life emanating from a vase which
is barely there.
This
devilishly simple seeming delight by Leslie
Klaar speaks with just a few flat colors yet tells the whole story
What
so you think about this little gem, by John
Lovett. Its all about the center of interest. How many colors do you see. Even though it seems
so colorful, there is only yellow-orqnge and blue-green. The color harmony is critical here.
This
reminds me of John Singer Sergeants work. Color is secondary to the values of this elegant composition
by William H. Jones. Of
course its a canal scene in Venice.Notice that the color scheme is the similar to the one above.
Thomas Freeman shows
us how to push objects back into the distance. See how he expertly uses ever fainter and less contrast(y)
washes to give us such impressive depth.
How
about some color. It takes a magician to use every single color in one painting and not make a mess.
This beauty by Wyatt Waters
tingles with excitement. There is nothing here except some glass and some fruit, but boy, does it sing.
And
if the above isn't enough color for you. consider this painting by Eleykaa
Thaleh. Try looking the other way, (if you can).
This
amazing painting by Alvaro
Castagnet is a study in values, ( contrast between dark and light ), The foreground has huge contrast,
while the background has only lighter values.
Dennis
Albetski painted this subtle work using the techniques of watercolor to their greatest advantage.
There was a lot of wet in wet, and flicking going on here. Notice how the blue-green "pops"
against the "red-orange" of the background. They are "complementary" colors.
I am a
sucker for this sort of work by Jeanne
Dobie. There is a marvelous intensity to her shapes. Notice that she put a "hole" in
the middle. I think thats kind of cool.
Here
is another example of contrasts. There are only two colors in this painting, the blue and orange, "complementary
colors". What amazes me about it is the composition. Its so "curvilinear". The stones
are round, the fish are arcs, and the subject is a wheel of fish.
If
you are going to paint this precisely, you better be good, because any flaw will stand out.
I like the contrast between the girl with the background.
Notice the "analogous" color scheme. Using only reds and oranges makes this a very "warm"
painting.
I reproduced it so large to show the incredible detail. You can see it bigger and better at Paul
W. McCormacks web site
This
is referred to as non-representational art. It is way harder than it looks.
Charlotte Huntley is a
master at it because this accumulating of shapes and colors had to be created from nothing at all.
Here are some other art resources:
The American Watercolor Society
The National Watercolor Society
Art History
The New York City Art Scene.
Has been good for the captains watercolor paintings.